<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bing Allows Search Result Spam By Domain Name Keywords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dnxpert.com/2009/07/17/bing-allows-search-result-spam-by-domain-name-keywords/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dnxpert.com/2009/07/17/bing-allows-search-result-spam-by-domain-name-keywords/</link>
	<description>A blog about the domain name industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:04:16 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: wwwtwitter.com, wwwbing.com, wwwapple.com and Others &#124; Domain Name News &#124; Domain News &#124; Expired Domains</title>
		<link>http://www.dnxpert.com/2009/07/17/bing-allows-search-result-spam-by-domain-name-keywords/comment-page-1/#comment-7313</link>
		<dc:creator>wwwtwitter.com, wwwbing.com, wwwapple.com and Others &#124; Domain Name News &#124; Domain News &#124; Expired Domains</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnxpert.com/?p=1821#comment-7313</guid>
		<description>[...] Patrick McAuliffe, the owner of wwwbing.com, also makes sure to point out that his website is in no way affiliated to www.bing.com &#8211; Microsoft&#8217;s recently launched search engine. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Patrick McAuliffe, the owner of wwwbing.com, also makes sure to point out that his website is in no way affiliated to <a href="http://www.bing.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.bing.com</a> &#8211; Microsoft&#8217;s recently launched search engine. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: humor</title>
		<link>http://www.dnxpert.com/2009/07/17/bing-allows-search-result-spam-by-domain-name-keywords/comment-page-1/#comment-6967</link>
		<dc:creator>humor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 23:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnxpert.com/?p=1821#comment-6967</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t forget bing is a new search engine... We will see many changes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t forget bing is a new search engine&#8230; We will see many changes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.dnxpert.com/2009/07/17/bing-allows-search-result-spam-by-domain-name-keywords/comment-page-1/#comment-6964</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 08:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnxpert.com/?p=1821#comment-6964</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s definitely something they will fine tune, as can be read from a comment on that forum thread from one of the members of the Bing team.

When Google got popular a lot of people exploited this exact scenario to get huge traffic for their parked or affiliate websites that don&#039;t sport much content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s definitely something they will fine tune, as can be read from a comment on that forum thread from one of the members of the Bing team.</p>
<p>When Google got popular a lot of people exploited this exact scenario to get huge traffic for their parked or affiliate websites that don&#8217;t sport much content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://www.dnxpert.com/2009/07/17/bing-allows-search-result-spam-by-domain-name-keywords/comment-page-1/#comment-6958</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnxpert.com/?p=1821#comment-6958</guid>
		<description>Hopefully they can fine tune this and not change it completely. I think stuff like MusicalInstruments.com should appear at the top if someone searches for &quot;Musical Instruments&quot;, but only as long as the content on the site is relavent to musical instruments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hopefully they can fine tune this and not change it completely. I think stuff like MusicalInstruments.com should appear at the top if someone searches for &#8220;Musical Instruments&#8221;, but only as long as the content on the site is relavent to musical instruments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nameclerk</title>
		<link>http://www.dnxpert.com/2009/07/17/bing-allows-search-result-spam-by-domain-name-keywords/comment-page-1/#comment-6957</link>
		<dc:creator>Nameclerk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dnxpert.com/?p=1821#comment-6957</guid>
		<description>ArchitecturalRenderings.com is a little light on content but it has a PR of 4 and appears to be unique and contains enough to get indexed.

I&#039;m more baffled by Renderings.com which is ranked 5th and appears to be 100% flash with no index-able content visible to SE&#039;s. The site also has a PR of 4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ArchitecturalRenderings.com is a little light on content but it has a PR of 4 and appears to be unique and contains enough to get indexed.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m more baffled by Renderings.com which is ranked 5th and appears to be 100% flash with no index-able content visible to SE&#8217;s. The site also has a PR of 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
